Section 11B limitation does not govern Rule 5 Cenvat refund claims for accumulated export credit.

Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 permits cash refund of accumulated credit arising from exports under bond, subject to the prescribed procedure and conditions. The issue was whether the limitation period in Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applied to such refund claims. The analysis notes that Notification No. 11/2002-CE (NT) required filing within the Section 11B period but did not itself provide a relevant date for computing limitation, and the Section 11B explanation on relevant date was geared to rebate claims on exported goods, not Rule 5 refunds dependent on accumulated unutilised credit. The limitation under Section 11B was therefore held not to govern the claim, and the refund could not be rejected as time-barred.

---

---

Issues: Whether the limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applied to a claim for cash refund of accumulated Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.

Analysis: Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 permits cash refund of accumulated credit arising from exports under bond, subject to the procedure and conditions in the relevant notification. Notification No. 11/2002-CE (NT) required the application to be filed before the expiry of the period specified in Section 11B, but it did not itself prescribe any relevant date for computation of limitation. The definition of relevant date in Explanation B to Section 11B applies to rebate claims on exported goods and does not fit a refund of accumulated credit under Rule 5, which depends not only on export but also on the inability to utilise the credit for domestic clearances. Since a limitation provision must contain both the period and the starting point for computation, the notification was treated as incomplete for Rule 5 refund claims. The Court followed the view that the strict limitation under Section 11B does not govern such claims.

Conclusion: The limitation under Section 11B was held not applicable to the Rule 5 refund claim, and the refund claim could not be rejected as time-barred.

---