Tribunal Orders 25% Pre-Deposit to Waive Balance Dues & Stay Recovery

The Tribunal directed the applicant to make a pre-deposit of 25% of Rs.2.07 Crores within eight weeks. Compliance would result in the waiver of the balance amount of dues and a stay on recovery during the appeal's pendency. Failure to deposit would lead to the dismissal of both appeals without further notice.

---

---

Issues:
Waiver of pre-deposit of Cenvat Credit and penalty under Rule 15(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

Analysis:
The case involved an application seeking waiver of pre-deposit of Cenvat Credit and penalty amounting to Rs.3,25,52,784 imposed under Rule 15(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The applicants, engaged in manufacturing 'Iron & Steel Products,' had availed Cenvat Credit on items like MS Angles/Bars/Beams treated as 'capital goods.' Show cause notices were issued disputing the classification of these items as capital goods. The Ld. Sr. Advocate argued that a significant portion of the demand was time-barred, offering to deposit 25% of the amount related to the demand for the normal period. The Revenue's Ld. A.R. reiterated the findings of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals).

The Tribunal considered the period from February, 2004 to July, 2009, and noted its consistent view in cases involving availment of Cenvat Credit on items like Angles, Channels, Beams as capital goods. Referring to the principles laid down by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in a previous case, the Tribunal directed the applicant to make a pre-deposit of 25% of Rs.2.07 Crores within eight weeks. Compliance was to be reported by a specified date. Upon compliance, the balance amount of dues would be waived, and recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency. Failure to deposit would result in the dismissal of both appeals without further notice. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.

This judgment highlights the Tribunal's approach to pre-deposit of Cenvat Credit and penalties under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, emphasizing the importance of compliance with directives within specified timelines to avoid dismissal of appeals.

---