Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal in a dispute concerning valuation of vanilla flavour under the excise valuation rules.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the applicability of the valuation provisions, including Rule 9, Rule 10A and Rule 11 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, and on the nature of the relationship between the parties and the transaction structure. For the limited purpose of stay, the Tribunal noted that the assessee had earlier sought clarification from the department and had been informed that the price at which the buyer sold the goods need not be adopted. The Tribunal also found that the decision cited by the appellants appeared prima facie applicable. On that basis, the appellants were held to have made out a prima facie case on merits.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of duty, penalty and interest was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.