Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in relation to the demand of Cenvat credit, interest and penalty, having regard to the effective date of amalgamation.
Analysis: The order recorded that the amalgamation of the appellant with the erstwhile company had been approved by the High Court with effect from 01.06.2005. On that basis, the appellant and the erstwhile company were separate entities prior to that date, and there was no question of transfer of Cenvat credit balance before the amalgamation became effective. The available credit on 12.05.2005 was found to have been utilised by the erstwhile company during May 2005, and no balance remained on 01.06.2005. In these circumstances, the departmental case was held to be unsustainable at the prima facie stage.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the demand, interest and penalty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.