Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay against recovery in respect of the demand arising from clearance of inputs sold in auction and written off in the books.
Analysis: The recorded materials showed that the appellant had placed a statement before the department correlating the items sold in auction with their part numbers, unit value, book value and sale price. There was no discussion of that statement in the lower orders. No admission by the company officials was shown to establish that the inputs written off and the inputs auctioned were different, and the department had not produced any other evidence to disprove the linkage. The order also noted that, for the relevant period, duty on inputs cleared as such was payable on transaction value.
Conclusion: The appellant established a prima facie case. Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.