Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court had territorial jurisdiction to entertain the income-tax appeals where the impugned orders were passed by the Tribunal within its territorial limits.
Analysis: The appeal was treated as an extension of a suit for the purpose of determining forum and venue. The principles embodied in the Code of Civil Procedure governing place of suing were applied, particularly the rule that jurisdiction follows the place where the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises. As the impugned orders were those of the Tribunal and were passed within the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court, the cause of action was held to arise within that jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The High Court had territorial jurisdiction to decide the appeals.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were held to be maintainable before the High Court on jurisdictional grounds, but they ultimately failed and stood dismissed in line with the earlier decision on the same substantial questions of law.
Ratio Decidendi: In an appeal, jurisdiction may be founded on the territorial location where the impugned appellate order was passed, since the cause of action for the appeal arises where that order is made.