Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether levy of interest under section 139 had a bearing on the validity of penalty under section 271(1)(a) for failure to file the return within time.
Analysis: The return was filed beyond the extended date, and interest had been charged under section 139. Following the Supreme Court ruling relied upon by the Court, once interest is charged under proviso (iii) to section 139(1), the time for filing the return is treated as having been extended. In such a situation, the return cannot be treated as having been filed out of time for the purpose of penalty under section 271(1)(a).
Conclusion: The Tribunal was wrong in holding that levy of interest under section 139 had nothing to do with levy of penalty under section 271(1)(a), and the answer was in favour of the assessee.