Section 138 cheque dishonour liability cannot exceed the statutory fine ceiling by adding separate compensation.

In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Court held that the accused could not be saddled with an additional monetary direction beyond the statutory ceiling by treating compensation under Section 357(3) CrPC as separate from fine. The compensation power operates out of the fine imposed, and the total monetary liability cannot exceed the limit prescribed by the statute. Because the complainant had already received adequate compensation, the further direction to pay the cheque amount again was unsustainable. The additional payment direction was set aside, and only a further fine of Rs.20,000 with default imprisonment of six months remained.

---

---

Issues: Whether, in a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the accused could be directed to pay an additional amount over and above the compensation already paid, and whether the total monetary liability could exceed the statutory limit by treating compensation under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as separate from the fine.

Analysis: The cheque amount was Rs.69,500 and the complainant had already received Rs.80,000 as compensation. The statutory scheme of Section 138 permits imprisonment or fine up to twice the cheque amount, and compensation under Section 357(3) CrPC cannot be used to bypass that ceiling. The power to award compensation operates out of the fine imposed, and the Court held that the High Court had wrongly treated the compensation already paid as distinct from the fine later imposed. Since the complainant had already been adequately compensated, any further direction to pay the cheque amount again was not legally sustainable.

Conclusion: The additional direction to pay the cheque amount was set aside, and the appellant was required to pay only Rs.20,000 as further fine, with default imprisonment of six months. The appeal was allowed in favour of the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi: In a Section 138 prosecution, the total fine cannot exceed the statutory ceiling, and compensation awarded from the fine cannot be separately added so as to impose a monetary liability beyond that limit.

---