Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether iron ore pellets imported by the appellants were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 4/2006-CE, and whether a prima facie case existed for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.
Analysis: The exemption entry covered ores falling under Chapter 26, and the tariff heading for iron ore pellets specifically described the goods as iron ore pellets. The chapter note was also viewed as supporting the assessee because the term ores was treated as covering minerals used in the metallurgical industry for extraction of metals. On that basis, the imported goods were held to fall within the exempted category for the limited purpose of interim relief.
Conclusion: The appellants were found to have made out a prima facie case for exemption and for interim protection, warranting waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.