Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in refusing to entertain the ground relating to the deductibility of capital subsidy in determining the actual cost of fixed assets for the purpose of depreciation, and whether such question of law arose for reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The application concerned a request for reference on the Tribunal's refusal to entertain the assessee's ground regarding capital subsidy and its effect on the actual cost of assets for depreciation. The Court found that the proposed question was a question of law arising from the Tribunal's order and therefore warranted reference to the High Court's opinion.
Conclusion: The reference application was allowed and the Tribunal was directed to state the case and refer the question of law to the High Court.