Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to total waiver of pre-deposit in respect of the service tax demand, including the plea that the franchisee service demand was time-barred.
Analysis: The demand arose from multiple taxable services and the principal component related to franchisee service. The applicant did not dispute liability on merits for that component and relied on limitation, but the statement recorded in the course of investigation only disclosed the activity and did not negate the subsequent findings of representational rights granted to more than 100 centres for consideration. The applicant also did not deny receipt of consideration for the other taxable services and, in some instances, had collected service tax without remitting it. On these facts, a case for total waiver of pre-deposit was not made out.
Conclusion: Total waiver was declined. The applicant was directed to pre-deposit Rs. 1 crore, and the balance demand was waived and recovery stayed pending the appeal.
Final Conclusion: The application for waiver was allowed only in part, with conditional relief granted against the remaining demand during the pendency of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a party fails to establish a strong prima facie case and the demand is supported by admitted facts showing taxable services for consideration, total waiver of pre-deposit is not warranted.