TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether garments stitched from fabric bought or brought by customers were excisable and liable to central excise duty; (ii) whether clearances of the two alleged dummy units could be clubbed with the clearances of the main unit; and (iii) the consequential liability to duty, exemption and penalties.
Issue (i): Whether garments stitched from fabric bought or brought by customers were excisable and liable to central excise duty.
Analysis: Garments stitched to the measurements of individual customers were held to be marketable goods capable of being brought to and sold in the market. The absence of a sale transaction in the tailoring arrangement did not negative manufacture. Rule 7AA of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and its successor provisions were read as shifting duty liability, in specified textile job-work situations, to the person getting the goods manufactured on his account, but the Tribunal held that these provisions did not fasten duty on the assessee for garments stitched from customer-supplied fabric in the manner alleged by Revenue.
Conclusion: The demand of duty on garments stitched from fabric bought or brought by customers was not sustainable and was set aside.
Issue (ii): Whether clearances of the two alleged dummy units could be clubbed with the clearances of the main unit.
Analysis: The evidence showed that the two concerns had no independent employees or manufacturing facilities, were controlled by the same management, used common resources, and functioned only on paper. The Tribunal held that the transactions were routed through these units and that the proprietary concerns were dummy units. It further held that the notice issued to the proprietors, who were parties throughout and responded to the proposals, was sufficient and that the extended period was invocable because the dummy nature of the units had been suppressed.
Conclusion: Clubbing of the clearances of the two units with the main assessee was upheld and the related duty demand was sustained.
Issue (iii): What was the effect on duty, exemption and penalties arising from the above findings.
Analysis: Since the duty demand on customer-supplied fabric garments was set aside, the connected questions of exemption and valuation for that segment did not survive. As to the clubbing demand, the Tribunal found that quantification required reworking, including consideration of tariff-value valuation, exemption claims, and appropriate penalty consequences, with an opportunity to settle in terms of Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside except to the extent of the clubbing finding, and the matter was remitted for fresh quantification and penalty determination on the surviving demand.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the issue of dutiability of garments stitched from customer-supplied fabric, while Revenue succeeded on the clubbing of clearances of the dummy units; the remaining consequences were left for re-determination.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods stitched from customer-supplied fabric may still be excisable if marketable, but duty liability can only be fastened in accordance with the specific job-work and removal provisions applicable to the manufacturing arrangement; dummy units with common control and no independent existence may have their clearances clubbed, with extended limitation applying where such arrangement is suppressed.
TaxTMI 
