Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand and penalties based on clubbing the clearances of the appellant with those of other independent manufacturing units could be sustained when no show cause notice was issued to those other units.
Analysis: The dispute concerned a small-scale unit whose clearances were proposed to be clubbed with the clearances of six other existing firms and companies for denial of SSI exemption. The decisive defect was that no show cause notice had been issued to those other units, even though their clearances were directly sought to be included and their separate existence and control structure were in issue. The absence of notice deprived them of an opportunity to meet the allegation that all units were owned and controlled by one person. A unilateral determination on clubbing, without hearing the units whose clearances were to be added, was held to be impermissible. The precedent relied upon by the Revenue was distinguished because it involved dummy units without separate existence.
Conclusion: The proceedings were vitiated for want of notice to the other units, and the demand and penalties could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the impugned order was set aside.