Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale and transfer of DEPB licences by the assessee constituted business or transactions incidental or ancillary to its main business, so as to attract sales tax under the amended sales tax definitions.
Analysis: The amended definition of business under the State sales tax law included not only trade, commerce or manufacture, but also any transaction in connection with, or incidental or ancillary to, such activity. The Court held that the earlier decisions relied on by the assessee turned on unamended definitions or materially different facts. The sale of DEPB licences was linked to the assessee's export activity and arose under the foreign trade policy on the basis of export volume and value. In that context, the transfer of DEPB licences could not be treated as a stray or isolated activity outside the business sphere. The absence of direct purchase of the licence did not alter the character of the transaction for tax purposes.
Conclusion: The sale and transfer of DEPB licences were taxable as business transactions incidental to the assessee's business, and the assessee's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Under an amended sales tax definition that includes transactions connected with or incidental to trade, commerce or manufacture, a transfer of DEPB licences arising from export activity constitutes business and is exigible to tax even without proof of a separate independent licence-trading business.