Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether input tax credit could be availed and utilised on the purchase of DEPB licences under the Tamil Nadu VAT Act, 2006, and whether the demand for reversal of such credit was sustainable.
Analysis: DEPB scrips were treated as goods and the Court noted the broader scheme of the Act, including the definitions of goods, input and input tax, and the mechanism of input tax credit under Section 19. However, the Court held itself bound by the earlier Division Bench decision which had answered against availability of input tax credit on purchase of DEPB licences. Although reservations were expressed about aspects of that earlier reasoning, the Court declined to hold it per incuriam and accepted that the binding precedent governed the present case.
Conclusion: The challenge to the reversal of input tax credit failed and the demand was upheld in substance.