Mis-declaration and undervaluation in imports upheld after lab testing confirmed the goods differed from the declared description.

Imported goods were found, on laboratory testing, to be vegetable oil rather than the declared vegetable fatty acid, supporting a finding of mis-declaration in description. The record also indicated the importer's awareness of the true nature of the goods, and the declared transaction value was rejected as unacceptable in light of that mis-declaration. Valuation adopted by the adjudicating authority was examined against the laboratory evidence and applicable valuation rules and was found reasonable. On that basis, the factual foundation for confiscation remained intact, and the consequential duty demand and penalty were sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported goods were mis-declared in description and value, and whether the re-determination of value, demand of duty, confiscation and penalty were sustainable.

Analysis: The goods were tested by two laboratories and were found to be vegetable oil rather than the declared vegetable fatty acid. The record also showed the importer's awareness of the true nature of the goods, and the declared transaction value was found unacceptable in view of the mis-declaration. The valuation adopted by the adjudicating authority was examined with reference to the laboratory results and the applicable valuation rules, and was found to be reasonable. The factual basis for confiscation and consequential duty demand and penalty therefore remained intact.

Conclusion: The mis-declaration and undervaluation were upheld, and the confiscation, duty demand, and penalty were sustained in favour of Revenue.

---