Unit with over 250 workers entitled to Cenvat Credit on service tax for 'Outdoor catering Service'

The court affirmed the decision in favor of the respondent unit, holding that a unit with over 250 workers was entitled to Cenvat Credit on service tax paid for 'Outdoor catering Service' used for canteen facilities. The judge emphasized statutory obligations under the Factories Act and aligned with precedents set by the Bombay and Gujarat High Courts. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of judicial precedents in tax law interpretation and application.

---

---

Issues:
Whether a unit with more than 250 workers is eligible for Cenvat Credit on service tax paid for 'Outdoor catering Service' provided for canteen facility to workers and staff.

Analysis:
The judgment revolves around the eligibility of a respondent unit, with over 250 workers, for Cenvat Credit on service tax paid for 'Outdoor catering Service' utilized for canteen facilities. The Assistant Commissioner initially disallowed the credit, leading to a demand of Rs. 3,10,407 along with penalties. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) partially allowed the appeal, restricting the inadmissibility of Cenvat Credit only to the extent that charges for the canteen facility were recovered from employees. This decision was based on the judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in a specific case. The Revenue appealed against this decision.

Upon hearing both sides, the judge noted that the issue had been settled against the Department not only by the Bombay High Court but also by the Gujarat High Court in similar cases. The judge emphasized that as the respondent's factory had more than 250 workers, they were obligated under the Factories Act to provide canteen facilities. The judge concurred with the Commissioner (Appeals) that Cenvat Credit would only be inadmissible to the extent that charges for the canteen facility were recovered from employees. The judge found no fault in the Commissioner's decision, aligning it with the precedents set by the Bombay and Gujarat High Courts. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision in favor of the respondent unit.

This judgment underscores the significance of statutory obligations under the Factories Act regarding canteen facilities for workers in determining the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on service tax paid for such services. It also highlights the importance of judicial precedents in interpreting and applying tax laws, ensuring consistency and fairness in tax disputes.

---