Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital goods credit was admissible on items falling under Chapter 85 of the Central Excise Tariff that were used for fabrication and erection of a paint shop fixed to the earth.
Analysis: The decisive considerations for capital goods credit were whether the goods fell within the specified tariff chapters and whether they were used in the factory. The fact that the goods were ultimately used to fabricate or erect plant or machinery that became fixed to the earth did not, by itself, take away the entitlement to credit. The nature of the finished structure as immovable property was held to be irrelevant to the credit eligibility of the inputs or capital goods received and used in the factory. Since there was no dispute that the goods were covered by Chapter 85 and were used in the factory, denial of credit on the ground that the paint shop was immovable could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The credit was held admissible and the assessee succeeded on this issue.
Ratio Decidendi: For capital goods credit, the relevant test is the statutory coverage of the goods and their use in the factory, not whether the end use results in an immovable structure fixed to the earth.