CENVAT credit for business-linked services and airport project goods upheld despite classification and immovable property objections

CENVAT credit was treated as admissible for input services with a real business nexus to output services, including feasibility and consultancy for a hotel project, business travel, promotional events, sponsorship, photography, landscaping, immigration support, guest house upkeep, hotel accommodation, membership fees, and repair or modification work in airport . The decision also accepted credit on project-import goods and special-purpose items used in airport operations, including Passenger Boarding Bridge, Bridge Mount Converter, lighting equipment, Mobile Command Post Vehicles, Projection Screens and Advertising Structures, rejecting denial based on tariff classification or alleged connection with immovable property. Overall, the assessee's credit claims were upheld.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on the disputed input services used for hotel project, travel, events, sponsorship, photography, landscaping, immigration, guest house, flower decoration, hotel accommodation, membership fees and construction-related repair works; (ii) whether CENVAT credit was admissible on Passenger Boarding Bridge, Bridge Mount Converter, light and lighting equipment, Mobile Command Post Vehicles, Projection Screens and Advertising Structures imported or used for airport operations.

Issue (i): Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on the disputed input services used for hotel project, travel, events, sponsorship, photography, landscaping, immigration, guest house, flower decoration, hotel accommodation, membership fees and construction-related repair works.

Analysis: The disputed services were examined in the context of the definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Services relating to feasibility study and consultancy for the hotel project were treated as business-related and eligible. Likewise, travel for business meetings, award and promotional events, sponsorship, photography, landscaping connected with airport activity, relocation and immigration support for expats, guest house upkeep, and other business-support services were found to have nexus with the appellant's output services. Repair and modification services in the airport premises were also held to fall within the inclusive portion of the input service definition.

Conclusion: CENVAT credit on these disputed input services was held admissible in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on Passenger Boarding Bridge, Bridge Mount Converter, light and lighting equipment, Mobile Command Post Vehicles, Projection Screens and Advertising Structures imported or used for airport operations.

Analysis: The goods imported as project imports were treated as eligible for credit notwithstanding their classification under the Customs Tariff, since the CENVAT Credit Rules did not impose the restrictive conditions urged by the Revenue. The Mobile Command Post Vehicles were treated as special purpose vehicles covered by the capital goods definition under Rule 2(a)(A)(viii) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The reasoning also rejected the objection that the items formed part of civil structure so as to deny credit.

Conclusion: CENVAT credit on these goods was held admissible in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The assessee's appeals succeeded and the Revenue's challenge to the grant of credit failed, with the disputed CENVAT credit claims upheld overall.

Ratio Decidendi: For CENVAT purposes, services and goods having a real business nexus with the provision of output services are eligible even if they are not directly used in service delivery, and project-import goods or special-purpose capital goods cannot be denied credit merely because of their tariff classification or alleged linkage with immovable property.

---