Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's grievance regarding non-consideration of its application under Section 197 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and delay in disposal warranted immediate adjudication by the Court.
Analysis: The Court recorded the petitioner's grievance that substantial refunds had become due because of excess tax deducted at source and that the application under Section 197 had allegedly not been entertained before 1 April 2013. It observed prima facie that such an approach should not be followed and that expeditious disposal of such matters is required. The Court, however, did not enter into a final adjudication on the merits of the controversy and instead directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory revision remedy first.
Outcome: The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court again in case of delay or an adverse order.