Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, a joint account holder who did not sign the cheque can be prosecuted.
Analysis: Liability under Section 138 is attracted only against the drawer of the cheque, because the offence is built on the act of drawing the cheque on an account maintained by that person and the statutory ingredients must be strictly satisfied. Criminal liability cannot be extended by implication, and Section 141 creates vicarious liability only in the limited situations expressly covered by it. Where a cheque from a joint account is signed by only one account holder, the other joint account holder, who neither drew nor signed the cheque, does not fall within the penal liability created by Section 138.
Conclusion: A joint account holder who is not the signatory and drawer of the cheque cannot be prosecuted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.