Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the interest received on the decretal amount, having already been assessed in the hands of the sister concern, could again be taxed in the hands of the assessee, and whether any referable question of law arose from the Tribunal's deletion of the addition.
Analysis: The decretal amount together with interest had been received by the sister concern, and the interest had in fact been finally assessed in its hands. The same income could not lawfully be taxed twice in the hands of two different assessees. In that view, the Tribunal was correct in deleting the addition from the assessee's assessment, and no question of law arose for reference.
Conclusion: The deletion of the interest income was upheld and the reference petition failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Income that has been finally assessed in the hands of one assessee cannot again be taxed in the hands of another assessee on the same facts.