Department's Appeal Dismissed by ITAT, Assessee Prevails

The appeal filed by the department challenging the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 was dismissed by the ITAT. Additionally, the department's appeal on the taxability of profit from the sale of equipment in India was rejected, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision. The ITAT also ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the taxability of inward remittance received from the Head Office, directing the AO to delete the addition. Consequently, the department's appeals were dismissed, while the assessee's appeal was allowed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of notice issued under Section 148.
2. Taxability of profit from the sale of equipment in India.
3. Taxability of inward remittance received from the Head Office.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of Notice Issued Under Section 148:
The department appealed against the CIT(A)'s decision that the notice issued under Section 148 was invalid. The original assessment was framed under Section 143(1). The AO reopened the assessment based on the details of a civil suit for an insurance claim, believing that the offshore contract for USD 103 million was not disclosed. However, the CIT(A) found that all relevant documents were already examined in the original assessment and that the AO had merely changed his opinion without new evidence. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the AO did not have sufficient reason to believe there was an escapement of income, thus invalidating the reassessment proceedings under Section 148.

2. Taxability of Profit from Sale of Equipment in India:
The department also contested the CIT(A)'s ruling that the profit from the sale of equipment was not taxable in India. The CIT(A) had found that the offshore equipment supply contract was between KPCL and Hanjung, and the appellant company was responsible only for onshore civil and construction services. The ITAT noted that this issue was already settled in the assessee's favor in previous years' assessments, where it was consistently held that there was no sale of equipment by the appellant. Consequently, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s findings, rejecting the department's appeal on this ground.

3. Taxability of Inward Remittance Received from the Head Office:
The assessee appealed against the addition of Rs. 57,44,649/- as taxable income, which was received as a remittance from the Head Office. The ITAT referenced its earlier decision in the assessee's case for the assessment years 1999-2000 and 2002-2003, where it was held that such remittances were reimbursements of expenses and not taxable income. The ITAT followed this precedent and directed the AO to delete the addition, allowing the assessee's appeal.

Similarly, the department's appeal for the assessment year 2003-04, concerning the taxability of a remittance of Rs. 1,32,11,506/- from the Head Office, was dismissed. The ITAT applied the same reasoning and precedent from the assessee's earlier cases, rejecting the department's appeal.

Conclusion:
- ITA No. 3930/Mum/2006: Appeal filed by the department is dismissed.
- ITA No. 746/Mum/2007: Appeal filed by the department is dismissed.
- ITA No. 3897/Mum/2006: Appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 19th July, 2013.

---