Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Coop banks' interest on non-SLR deposits exempt under Income Tax Act, court rules in favor of assessee</h1> <h3>The Commisioner of Income Tax And Another Versus M/s District Co-Operative Bank Ltd.</h3> The Commisioner of Income Tax And Another Versus M/s District Co-Operative Bank Ltd. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Whether interest earned by a cooperative bank on deposits of its non-SLR funds is income from banking business and consequently exempt under Section 80-P (2) (a) (i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. Whether interest earned on deposits of non-SLR funds is covered within the meaning of Section 80-P (2) (a) (i) of the Act.3. Whether interest on non-SLR investment is exempt under Section 80-P (2) (a) (i) despite the definition of financing bank or central bank in the U.P. Cooperative Society Act not referring to Section 5 or 6 of the Banking Regulation Act and restricting banking business to only members of the cooperative societies of the assessee's bank.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Interest Earned on Non-SLR Funds as Income from Banking BusinessThe court examined whether the interest earned by a cooperative bank on the deposits of its non-SLR (Statutory Liquidity Ratio) funds qualifies as income from banking business and is thus exempt under Section 80-P (2) (a) (i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court referred to the Supreme Court's rulings in *Commissioner of Income Tax v. Karnataka State Cooperative Apex Bank* and *Mehsana District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer*, which established that income from statutory reserves is deductible under Section 80-P (2) (a) (i). The court concluded that the same reasoning applies to non-SLR funds, as interest earned from such deposits is attributable to the business of banking.Issue 2: Coverage of Interest on Non-SLR Funds under Section 80-P (2) (a) (i)The court considered whether interest earned on deposits of non-SLR funds falls within the scope of Section 80-P (2) (a) (i). The respondent argued that the Supreme Court in *Bihar State Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax* held that income from long-term deposits by cooperative banks is part of banking business income. The court also noted similar rulings by the Gujarat High Court, Andhra Pradesh High Court, and Bombay High Court, which supported the view that interest from non-SLR funds qualifies for deductions under Section 80-P (2) (a) (i). The court agreed with these precedents, affirming that such interest is attributable to the banking business.Issue 3: Exemption of Interest on Non-SLR Investment under Section 80-P (2) (a) (i)The court addressed whether interest on non-SLR investments is exempt under Section 80-P (2) (a) (i), considering the U.P. Cooperative Society Act's definitions. The court referred to the Supreme Court's interpretation in *Bihar State Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. CIT*, which clarified that interest earned from surplus funds deposited in other banks is part of the banking business. The court emphasized that the business of banking includes managing funds to ensure they are readily available to meet depositor demands, and thus, interest from such deposits is part of the bank's normal business operations.Conclusion:The court concluded that the interest earned by cooperative banks on deposits of non-SLR funds qualifies as income from the business of banking and is exempt under Section 80-P (2) (a) (i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found no error in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision and ruled in favor of the respondent assessee, deciding all three questions against the revenue. The department was directed to proceed accordingly.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found