Courier service tax refund denied where mandatory notification conditions and documentary particulars were not satisfied.

Refund of service tax on courier services under Notification No. 17/2009 was unavailable where the prescribed documentary conditions were not met. The notification required the courier receipt to state the exporter's IEC number, export invoice number, nature of the courier, destination details, and the recipient's name and address, along with proof that the courier service was used for export of goods. Because the receipt produced did not contain these particulars, the refund claim failed. On that basis, rejection of the refund was justified for non-compliance with the notification conditions.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to refund of service tax under Notification No. 17/2009 dated 07.07.2009 despite non-fulfilment of the prescribed conditions for courier-service refunds.

Analysis: The refund claim related to service tax paid on courier services covered by Sl. No. 10 of the notification. The notification required the courier receipt to specify the IEC number of the exporter, export invoice number, nature of the courier, destination details including the name and address of the recipient, and also required production of documents showing use of courier service for export of goods. The receipt produced by the appellant did not contain the requisite particulars. Since the prescribed conditions were not satisfied, the denial of refund was held to be justified.

Conclusion: The refund claim was rightly rejected for non-compliance with the notification conditions.

---