Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Tax Collected at Source under Section 206-C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was exigible from retail liquor vendors whose sale price was fixed by the Excise Commissioner under the U.P. Excise Act, 1910, and whether such vendors fell within the definition of "buyer".
Analysis: The petitioners held valid retail licences under the U.P. Excise Act, 1910, and the maximum retail price was fixed under Section 41(e)(iii) of that Act. Under Explanation (a)(iii) to Section 206-C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a buyer does not include a person where the goods are not obtained by auction and the sale price is fixed by or under a State Act. The governing principle applied was that a licence to carry on liquor trade does not, by itself, make the licensee a buyer of goods for the purpose of Section 206-C. On that basis, the petitioners were outside the ambit of tax collection at source.
Conclusion: The petitioners were not liable to deduction or collection of tax at source under Section 206-C, and the demand for TCS could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A liquor licensee whose sale price is fixed by or under a State Act and who does not obtain the goods by auction is not a "buyer" for the purposes of Section 206-C of the Income Tax Act, 1961; therefore, tax collected at source is not applicable.