Tribunal sets aside penalty under Income-tax Act for failure to make disallowances

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the failure to make disallowances under Section 43B was not mala fide, as the assessed loss remained significant even after disallowance. It was determined that the assessee had disclosed the payable amount, indicating no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Citing legal precedents, including decisions in Reliance Petroproducts Pvt.Ltd. and PricewaterhouseCoopers Pvt.Ltd., the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was not warranted in this case.

---

---

Issues:
Levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for disallowances under Section 43B.

Analysis:
The appeal challenged the penalty imposed on the assessee under Section 271(1)(c) for disallowances under Section 43B. The Tribunal considered the arguments and referred to decisions of the Hon'ble Apex Court to determine the issue. The first decision cited was CIT Vs. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt.Ltd., where it was held that a claim not sustainable in law does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars. The second decision referred to was PricewaterhouseCoopers Pvt.Ltd., emphasizing that a bona fide error in return filing does not constitute concealment of income. The Tribunal noted the CIT(A)'s reliance on the decision in CIT Vs. Zoom Communication Pvt.Ltd., which stressed the need for a bona fide claim to avoid penalty under Section 271(1)(c).

The Tribunal analyzed the facts and concluded that the failure to make disallowance under Section 43B was not mala fide, as the assessed loss even after disallowance was substantial. The Tribunal determined that the assessee had disclosed the payable amount, indicating no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Therefore, the decisions in Reliance Petroproducts Pvt.Ltd. and PricewaterhouseCoopers Pvt.Ltd. were deemed applicable, leading to the cancellation of the penalty under Section 271(1)(c).

In summary, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) based on the assessment of the facts and the applicability of relevant legal precedents.

---