Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2013 (7) TMI 76 - CGOVT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Government affirms excise duty rebate calculation method; rejects higher claim; corrects arithmetical error. The Government upheld the lower authorities' decision to calculate rebate claims for excise duty on exported goods based on Notification No. 32/2008-C.E. ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Government affirms excise duty rebate calculation method; rejects higher claim; corrects arithmetical error.

                          The Government upheld the lower authorities' decision to calculate rebate claims for excise duty on exported goods based on Notification No. 32/2008-C.E. (N.T.), rejecting the applicants' arguments for a higher rebate amount under Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.). The calculation method using specified formulas was deemed appropriate, with a minor correction made to rectify an arithmetical error in the rebate rate calculation. The revision applications filed by M/s. Dhariwal Industries Ltd. were disposed of accordingly, confirming the original orders.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Rebate claims for excise duty on exported goods.
                          2. Application of Notification No. 32/2008-C.E. (N.T.) versus Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.).
                          3. Calculation method for rebate claims.
                          4. Correction of arithmetical errors in rebate calculations.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          Rebate Claims for Excise Duty on Exported Goods:
                          The applicants, M/s. Dhariwal Industries Ltd., filed revision applications against the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals), which upheld the original orders of the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs. The applicants had cleared excisable goods for export under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, and filed rebate claims as per Notification No. 32/2008-C.E. (N.T.). However, the rebate sanctioning authority sanctioned lower amounts based on a specific formula, rejecting a total of Rs. 14,022,904.

                          Application of Notification No. 32/2008-C.E. (N.T.) Versus Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.):
                          The applicants argued that Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.) should apply, allowing for a full rebate of duty paid on exported goods. They contended that the notification had not been amended to restrict its applicability, and thus, they were eligible for the rebate. However, the Government observed that as per Rule 14 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination & Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008, no rebate shall be granted under Rule 18 except as specified in Notification No. 32/2008-C.E. (N.T.). Therefore, the rebate must be calculated according to the latter notification, and Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.) is not applicable.

                          Calculation Method for Rebate Claims:
                          The rebate claims were calculated using two formulas specified in Notification No. 32/2008-C.E. (N.T.):
                          - Formula 1: Monthly average rate of rebate per pouch, calculated by dividing the total duty paid for a month by the total quantity of pouches manufactured.
                          - Formula 2: Maximum amount of rebate per pouch, calculated by dividing the duty payable per machine per month by the total number of pouches deemed to be produced per machine.

                          The Government upheld the lower authorities' decision to use these formulas, rejecting the applicants' claims for a higher rebate amount.

                          Correction of Arithmetical Errors in Rebate Calculations:
                          The applicants contended that the rate of Rs. 2.18 per pouch was incorrectly calculated and should be Rs. 2.19. The Government found merit in this argument, directing the original authority to recalculate and sanction the rebate claims based on the corrected rate of Rs. 2.19 per pouch.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Government upheld the orders-in-original and orders-in-appeal, confirming that the rebate claims were correctly sanctioned as per Notification No. 32/2008-C.E. (N.T.). However, it directed a minor modification to correct the arithmetical error in the rebate rate calculation. The revision applications were disposed of accordingly.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found