Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was admissible when the original and duplicate ARE-1 forms duly certified by Customs were not produced with the rebate claim.
Analysis: The governing procedure under Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.) dated 6-9-2004 required the rebate claim to be filed with the original ARE-1 and contemplated verification of the original, duplicate and triplicate copies before sanction. The absence of the original and duplicate ARE-1 deprived the sanctioning authority of the basic document to verify export and duty-paid character of the goods. The defect was therefore treated as a failure to satisfy a statutory condition and not as a merely condonable procedural lapse. On the facts, the claim relating to the ARE-1 for which the original was not produced was disallowed, while the other claim was left undisturbed.
Conclusion: Rebate was not admissible for the claim unsupported by the original ARE-1, but the other sanctioned rebate was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The revision succeeded only to a limited extent and the rebate order was modified accordingly.
Ratio Decidendi: For rebate under Rule 18, production of the original and duplicate ARE-1 certified by Customs is a mandatory condition for establishing export, and its absence renders the rebate claim inadmissible.