TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the declared transaction value could be rejected on the ground that the importer and foreign supplier were related persons and the importer received a higher discount than other buyers.
Analysis: The discount policy showed that the foreign supplier offered different discounts for different markets, with an additional discount in markets where the product was new and required development. The higher discount was treated as a commercial measure to introduce the product in India and not as evidence that the relationship between the parties had influenced the price. Revenue did not produce any further material to show that the declared price was tainted or that the extra discount was specifically attributable to the relationship. The declared value was therefore found to be consistent with acceptable commercial practice and capable of acceptance under the valuation rule governing transaction value.
Conclusion: The transaction value was held to be acceptable and the rejection of declared value was set aside, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the valuation determined by the adjudicating authority was restored in effect by accepting the importer's declared value.
Ratio Decidendi: A commercial discount granted on a uniform market basis for introducing goods in a new market does not, by itself, justify rejection of transaction value unless there is evidence that the relationship between buyer and seller influenced the price.
TaxTMI 
