Appeal success: Depreciation allowed on machinery hire income.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of depreciation based on machinery hire income. The Tribunal held that even if the machinery was hired out for part of the year, the assessee was entitled to a fair proportionate deduction under section 38(2) of the Act. It reasoned that the machinery being hired out did not impact the allowance of depreciation as long as the assets were part of the block of assets and used for business purposes during the year. The Tribunal also invoked section 57 of the Act, allowing deduction for "income from other sources," including depreciation under section 32, supporting the assessee's claim.

---

---

Issues: Disallowance of depreciation based on machinery hire income.

Analysis:
1. The appeal arose from the order of the ld.CIT(Appeals)-VIII, Ahmedabad, concerning the disallowance of depreciation for A.Y. 2008-09.
2. The AO observed that the assessee, a construction company, had shown hire income from machinery not used for its own business, leading to a proportionate disallowance of depreciation.
3. The AO's disallowance was based on the lack of details provided by the assessee regarding the machinery used for earning hire income.
4. The first appellate authority affirmed the AO's decision, emphasizing that depreciation can only be claimed if the machinery is used for the business.
5. However, the Tribunal disagreed with the Revenue Department's view, noting that the machinery was hired out for part of the year, which did not preclude depreciation claims.
6. The Tribunal highlighted that even if the machinery was not exclusively used for the business, the assessee was entitled to a fair proportionate deduction under section 38(2) of the Act.
7. The Tribunal reasoned that the machinery being hired out did not impact the allowance of depreciation, as long as the assets were part of the block of assets and used for business purposes during the year.
8. Additionally, the Tribunal invoked section 57 of the Act, allowing deduction for "income from other sources," including depreciation under section 32, thereby supporting the assessee's claim.
9. Consequently, the Tribunal reversed the Revenue Authorities' decision and directed the allowance of the depreciation claim, concluding in favor of the assessee.
10. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, overturning the disallowance of depreciation based on the hire income from machinery.

---