Appeal Dismissed for Non-Compliance with Section 35F The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore due to the appellant's failure to comply with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act by ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal Dismissed for Non-Compliance with Section 35F
The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore due to the appellant's failure to comply with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act by not pre-depositing Rs.10.77 lakhs within the specified time despite extensions granted twice. The dismissal was based on the lack of evidence of any deposit made by the appellant.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The appellant failed to pre-deposit Rs.10.77 lakhs within the specified time despite extensions granted twice. No evidence of any deposit was provided. The appeal was dismissed as a result.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.