Revenue appeals dismissed for assessment years 1998-99 and 1999-2000.

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals for the assessment years 1998-99 and 1999-2000. The protective addition for low household expenses was deemed unsustainable, section 44AE was found inapplicable due to the number of vehicles owned and maintenance of regular books, and the assessee's status as a Resident but Not Ordinarily Resident (R & NOR) was confirmed, making them eligible for exemption under section 10(15).

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition on account of low household expenses on a protective basis for the assessment year 1998-99.
2. Applicability of section 44AE for computing income for the assessment year 1999-2000.
3. Determination of residential status and eligibility for exemption under section 10(15) for the assessment year 1999-2000.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition on Account of Low Household Expenses on a Protective Basis for the Assessment Year 1998-99:
The Revenue challenged the deletion of an addition of Rs. 3.60 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of low household expenses on a protective basis. The AO had initially made this addition during block assessment proceedings under section 158BC, which was later deleted by the Commissioner (Appeals) on merits. The AO reiterated this addition on a protective basis during regular assessment proceedings for the same amount. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that once the substantive addition was deleted on merits, the protective addition could not be sustained. The Tribunal upheld this view, noting that the addition was already deleted in the block assessment order and thus had no basis to stand in the regular assessment proceedings.

2. Applicability of Section 44AE for Computing Income for the Assessment Year 1999-2000:
The Revenue contested the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision that the income of Rs. 25,699 should be computed under the normal provisions of the Act rather than under section 44AE. The AO had invoked section 44AE, adding Rs. 1,54,197 as undisclosed income from the hiring of tankers, and apportioned part of this for the regular assessment period. The Commissioner (Appeals) found that section 44AE was inapplicable as the assessee owned more than ten vehicles and maintained regular audited books of account. The Tribunal upheld this decision, confirming that section 44AE applies only to those owning not more than ten goods carriages and that the assessee's maintenance of regular books of account further exempted them from this provision.

3. Determination of Residential Status and Eligibility for Exemption under Section 10(15) for the Assessment Year 1999-2000:
The AO had added Rs. 11,22,781 as interest income, arguing that the assessee's claim of being a Non-Ordinarily Resident (NOR) was incorrect. The Commissioner (Appeals) deleted this addition, referencing the Tribunal's earlier decision in the assessee's case for the assessment year 2002-03, which confirmed the assessee's NOR status and eligibility for exemption under section 10(15). The Tribunal agreed, noting that the assessee was a Resident but Not Ordinarily Resident (R & NOR) and thus eligible for the exemption. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals for both assessment years 1998-99 and 1999-2000, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decisions on all contested issues. The protective addition for low household expenses was deemed unsustainable, section 44AE was found inapplicable due to the number of vehicles and maintenance of regular books, and the assessee's NOR status and corresponding exemption under section 10(15) were confirmed.

---