Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sales tax on Copper Wire Rods and related goods was leviable at 1% under the applicable notification, and whether the revision petition deserved to be allowed on that basis.
Analysis: The applicable notification prescribed tax at 1%, and the factual position accepted before the authorities showed that the higher collection at 4% was inadvertent. The Tribunal's observation could not be read as an admission that 4% was the correct rate, because the dispute throughout was as to the proper rate of levy and the petitioner had not pressed any claim for refund of the differential amount. The issue was also covered by the earlier decision of the Court holding that the petitioner was liable only at 1%.
Conclusion: The rate of tax was 1% and the question was answered in favour of the petitioner and against the revenue.