Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2013 (5) TMI 269 - SC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Workmen's pari passu charge in liquidation governs distribution of recovery proceeds, while dues are quantified by the liquidator. The SC held that the Debts Recovery Tribunal cannot adjudicate or quantify workmen's dues of a company in liquidation; that task belongs to the liquidator ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Workmen's pari passu charge in liquidation governs distribution of recovery proceeds, while dues are quantified by the liquidator.

                          The SC held that the Debts Recovery Tribunal cannot adjudicate or quantify workmen's dues of a company in liquidation; that task belongs to the liquidator under company court supervision. It further held that once a winding up order or provisional liquidation intervenes, workmen obtain a statutory pari passu charge over the security of secured creditors to the extent of their workmen's portion. Sale proceeds realised under a recovery certificate must therefore be distributed in accordance with that priority, with the relevant apportionment fixed by the date of winding up. The High Court's directions were set aside and the matter remitted accordingly.




                          Issues: (i) Whether the Debts Recovery Tribunal has jurisdiction to adjudicate and quantify the workmen's claims against a company in liquidation for the purpose of distribution of sale proceeds under the recovery certificate. (ii) Whether, after a winding up order or appointment of a provisional liquidator, the workmen's dues acquire a pari passu charge over the security of secured creditors and how the sale proceeds are to be distributed.

                          Issue (i): Whether the Debts Recovery Tribunal has jurisdiction to adjudicate and quantify the workmen's claims against a company in liquidation for the purpose of distribution of sale proceeds under the recovery certificate.

                          Analysis: The statutory scheme of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 confers exclusive jurisdiction on the Debts Recovery Tribunal to adjudicate bank and financial institution claims and on the Recovery Officer to execute the recovery certificate. However, the Act does not confer power on the Tribunal to determine the substantive dues of workmen of the debtor company. Section 19(19) is a distribution provision that operates after adjudication of the bank's claim and does not itself authorise the Tribunal to adjudicate workmen's claims. Once the company is in liquidation, the liquidator is the competent authority to determine workmen's dues under the supervision of the company court.

                          Conclusion: The Debts Recovery Tribunal cannot adjudicate the workmen's claims; such claims must be determined by the liquidator.

                          Issue (ii): Whether, after a winding up order or appointment of a provisional liquidator, the workmen's dues acquire a pari passu charge over the security of secured creditors and how the sale proceeds are to be distributed.

                          Analysis: On winding up, Sections 529 and 529A of the Companies Act, 1956 create a statutory pari passu charge in favour of workmen to the extent of the workmen's portion in the security of every secured creditor. That position applies even where the assets were sold in execution of a DRT recovery certificate, if final disbursement had not been completed before liquidation intervened. The relevant date for apportionment is the date of the winding up order, and distribution of proceeds realised under the recovery certificate must be made by the Debts Recovery Tribunal in accordance with the mandate of Section 529A, while the liquidator determines the workmen's dues.

                          Conclusion: Workmen are entitled to pari passu treatment from the date of winding up or provisional liquidation, and the proceeds are to be distributed accordingly.

                          Final Conclusion: The impugned directions of the High Court were set aside, and the matter was remitted for further action consistent with the principle that workmen's claims are to be adjudicated by the liquidator, while distribution of realised sale proceeds must respect the statutory pari passu charge.

                          Ratio Decidendi: In the winding up of a company, the liquidator alone determines workmen's dues, while the Debts Recovery Tribunal's role is confined to sale and distribution of realised proceeds in accordance with Section 529A of the Companies Act, 1956, which gives workmen a statutory pari passu charge over the security of secured creditors to the extent of their workmen's portion.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found