Deceptive similarity in trademark and trade dress led to findings of infringement and passing off, with injunctive relief granted.

Deceptive similarity between a registered mark and an adopted mark can constitute trademark infringement where prior use and subsisting rights are established. Here, the plaintiff proved rights in GULABARI, and the defendant's use of GULVARI was found deceptively similar on unrebutted evidence, leading to a finding of infringement. Trade dress protection also extended to the plaintiff's distinctive pink, white and silver packaging scheme; the defendant's similar get-up, colour combination, cap and bottle size created a likelihood of consumer confusion and supported passing off. Injunctive relief was granted against use of the challenged mark and trade dress.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the defendant's use of the mark GULVARI infringed the plaintiff's registered mark GULABARI; (ii) Whether the defendant's packaging and get-up were deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trade dress and amounted to passing off.

Issue (i): Whether the defendant's use of the mark GULVARI infringed the plaintiff's registered mark GULABARI.

Analysis: The plaintiff's registration and unrebutted evidence established prior use and subsisting rights in the mark GULABARI. The mark adopted by the defendant was found to be deceptively similar, and the evidence remained unchallenged because the defendant did not appear or lead any rebuttal evidence. The Court accepted the plaintiff's evidence as true and held that the defendant's adoption of GULVARI amounted to infringement.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the plaintiff.

Issue (ii): Whether the defendant's packaging and get-up were deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trade dress and amounted to passing off.

Analysis: The plaintiff's trade dress was shown to feature a distinctive pink, white and silver colour combination with a particular layout and arrangement of features. The defendant's packaging was found visually similar in overall get-up, colour combination, cap and bottle size, creating a likelihood of confusion among consumers of rose water. In light of the nature of the goods and the relevant consumer class, the Court held that deception and confusion were inevitable and that the defendant's goods would be passed off as those of the plaintiff.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the plaintiff.

Final Conclusion: The plaintiff established both infringement and passing off, and injunctive relief was granted in respect of the challenged mark and trade dress.

Ratio Decidendi: Deceptively similar adoption of a registered mark and substantially similar trade dress that is likely to confuse consumers amounts to trademark infringement and passing off, warranting injunctive relief.

---