Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rejection of the petitioner's application for approval of the agreements under section 80RRA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was valid and whether the matter required reconsideration by a speaking order.
Analysis: Section 80RRA requires that services be rendered outside India by a person answering the description of a technician within the meaning of the provision, and does not make approval dependent on an employer-employee relationship. The impugned communication proceeded on an incorrect understanding of the statutory requirements and did not disclose proper consideration of the application. It was also not a speaking order, and the earlier rejection had not been duly addressed.
Conclusion: The rejection was unsustainable. The impugned letter was set aside and the matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh in accordance with law by a speaking order.