TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Indian citizens can claim deductions under Section 80RRA without physical stay abroad. Court directs unconditional approvals.</h1> <h3>AS Mani Versus Union of India And Others, BK Sinha Versus Secretary, Central Board of Direct Taxes And Others.</h3> AS Mani Versus Union of India And Others, BK Sinha Versus Secretary, Central Board of Direct Taxes And Others. - [2003] 264 ITR 5 Issues Involved:1. Interpretation of Section 80RRA of the Income-tax Act.2. Requirement of physical presence outside India for claiming deductions under Section 80RRA.3. Validity of conditional approvals and rejections by the Ministry of Finance.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Interpretation of Section 80RRA of the Income-tax Act:The court examined Section 80RRA, which provides for deductions in respect of remuneration received for services rendered outside India. The section states: 'Where the gross total income of an individual who is a citizen of India includes any remuneration received by him in foreign currency from any employer (being a foreign employer or an Indian concern) for any service rendered by him outside India, there shall... be allowed... a deduction from such remuneration of an amount equal to 75 per cent. of such remuneration.' The court emphasized that the words 'any services rendered by him outside India' are crucial and debated their interpretation.2. Requirement of Physical Presence Outside India:The court discussed whether physical presence outside India is necessary for claiming deductions under Section 80RRA. The respondents argued that benefits under Section 80RRA are available only if the technocrat or technician physically works outside India. However, the court found that in modern times, services can be rendered without physical presence abroad. The court referred to several judgments, including the Supreme Court's ruling in CBDT v. Aditya V. Birla, which stated that there is no requirement for physical presence outside India for claiming deductions under Section 80RRA. The court concluded that rendering service outside India need not involve physical presence, as technological advancements allow for remote services.3. Validity of Conditional Approvals and Rejections by the Ministry of Finance:The petitioner challenged the conditional approval and rejections issued by the Ministry of Finance. The court noted that the Ministry's conditional approval limited the exemption proportionally to the stay and work abroad. The petitioner sought reconsideration, which was not positively responded to, leading to the court challenge. The court found that the conditional approval and rejections were inconsistent with the legislative intent and the beneficial nature of Section 80RRA. The court set aside the conditional approval and directed the Central Government to approve the agreement unconditionally and provide deductions to the petitioners.Conclusion:The court held that physical stay or work outside India is not necessary for claiming deductions under Section 80RRA. The court set aside the conditional approval and rejections by the Ministry of Finance and directed the Central Government to approve the agreements unconditionally and provide the deductions as per Section 80RRA. The judgment emphasized the need for a beneficial interpretation of the statutory provisions to encourage earning and repatriation of foreign exchange by Indian citizens.
TaxTMI 