Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods detention could be interfered with and release ordered on compliance with tax payment and security for the compounding fee under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
Analysis: Section 70(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 requires the person in charge of a goods vehicle carrying Sixth Schedule goods through the State to obtain a transit pass from the first check post. The petitioner, a transporter, was treated as the person in charge, and the goods were detained for want of transit pass. The Court also relied on Section 67(3)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, which permits detention and requires payment of tax or furnishing of adequate security. Considering the petitioner's status as transporter and the Department's need to secure the compounding fee, the Court accepted the condition of tax payment coupled with bank guarantee for the compounding fee.
Conclusion: The detention was not quashed unconditionally; release of the goods was directed on payment of the tax demanded and furnishing of bank guarantee for the compounding fee, with liberty to pursue revision.