Winding up and pre-deposit rules shape appeal survival and interim relief in penalty disputes.

A company appeal abates on winding up unless continuance is sought by the successor-in-interest, liquidator, or other authorised legal representative within the prescribed time; as no such continuance was shown, the company's appeal was treated as abated. In penalty appeals against directors under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, interim relief can be made conditional on pre-deposit where the matter requires fuller consideration on the evidence; the individual appellants were directed to deposit Rs. 50,000 each, with waiver of the balance pre-deposit and stay of recovery until disposal of the appeals.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the appeal filed by the company abated on account of winding up under Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules; (ii) Whether the appeals of the two individual appellants against penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 could be entertained without pre-deposit and whether interim stay could be granted.

Issue (i): Whether the appeal filed by the company abated on account of winding up under Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules.

Analysis: The company had been ordered to be wound up by the High Court. Rule 22 provides that where a company is being wound up, the appeal shall abate unless continuance is sought by the successor-in-interest, liquidator, or other legal representative within the prescribed time. No such continuance was shown.

Conclusion: The company's appeal was dismissed as abated.

Issue (ii): Whether the appeals of the two individual appellants against penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 could be entertained without pre-deposit and whether interim stay could be granted.

Analysis: The penalties were imposed on the individuals as directors with a specific role attributed to them. The matter required consideration on the merits with reference to the evidence on record, but interim relief was made conditional on deposit.

Conclusion: The individual appellants were directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs.50,000 each, upon which waiver of the balance pre-deposit was granted and recovery was stayed till disposal of the appeals.

Final Conclusion: The company's appeal stood rejected as abated, while the individual appellants obtained conditional interim relief subject to pre-deposit.

Ratio Decidendi: A company appeal abates upon winding up unless continuation is sought by the legally entitled representative, and interim relief in penalty appeals may be made conditional upon pre-deposit where merits require fuller examination.

---