Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee-trust, created for the benefit of members of the Vaisya community and for certain public welfare objects, was a public charitable and religious trust entitled to exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the earlier decision for an earlier assessment year operated as res judicata.
Analysis: The expression "charitable purpose" under section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, includes relief of the poor, education, medical relief and advancement of any other object of general public utility. A purpose need not benefit all mankind; it is enough if it benefits a section of the public and not merely specified individuals. The objects of the trust, including financial help for marriage, medical aid, social welfare and uplift of poor members of the community, were held to be charitable in character. The earlier view against the assessee had been based on a concession and on a High Court decision later overruled, so it could not bind the court. The earlier assessment year decision also did not create res judicata in these reference proceedings.
Conclusion: The trust was held to be a religious and charitable trust entitled to exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A trust created for the benefit of a section of the public is charitable if its objects fall within the statutory concept of charitable purpose, and an earlier decision based on concession or on overruled authority does not bar a later determination of the same issue as res judicata.