Trust registration cannot be rejected solely for name mismatch between charity certificate and PAN database

ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing CIT (Exemptions) to re-examine the trust's registration application under Section 12AA. The court found that name mismatch between charity registration certificate and PAN database was adequately explained as translation difference from Gujarati to English (Bhutpurva Vidhyarthi Mandal to Alumni Association). The trust maintained consistent legal identity across government authorities. ITAT held that registration shouldn't be summarily rejected solely on name mismatch grounds and directed fresh examination of trust's activities and eligibility for registration, noting Section 13 provisions shouldn't apply at registration stage under Section 12AA.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Name Mismatch
2. Objects of the Trust Not for Public at Large

Summary:

Ground No. 1: Name Mismatch

The assessee/applicant trust explained the difference in names between the legal documents and the PAN database. The term "Parul University Bhutpurva Vidhyarthi Mandal" in Gujarati is translated to "Parul University Alumni Association" in English for better understanding and recognition. The trust submitted relevant language translation certificates and official recognition documents. The Tribunal found the explanation reasonable and directed the CIT (Exemptions) to re-examine the issue, concluding that the application should not be summarily rejected on the ground of name mismatch alone. Thus, Ground No. 1 was allowed for statistical purposes.

Ground No. 2: Objects of the Trust Not for Public at Large

The assessee argued that the trust's objects fall under "Advancement of any other general public utility" u/s 2(15) and benefit a cross-section of the public, not just a specific group. The Tribunal agreed that the trust's objects cannot be considered as benefiting only a particular community and that the provisions of Section 13 should not be invoked at the time of granting registration u/s 12AA. The matter was restored to the CIT (Exemptions) to examine the trust's activities and determine eligibility for registration u/s 12AA. Consequently, Ground No. 2 was allowed for statistical purposes.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the CIT (Exemptions) to re-examine both the name mismatch issue and the charitable nature of the trust's objects. The order was pronounced in open court on 24/04/2024.

---