Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-production expenditure incurred by the assessee-company by way of interest on loans, commitment charges, and legal and professional charges formed part of the actual cost of plant and machinery for depreciation allowance and development rebate, and whether the same expenditure formed part of the capital employed in the industrial undertaking for section 80J relief.
Analysis: The first part of the question was covered by the Supreme Court decision in Challapalli Sugars Ltd. v. CIT, which treated such pre-production expenditure as part of the actual cost of plant and machinery for depreciation and development rebate. The second part was accepted as consequential to the first.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee.