Gift-tax reference turns on timing of immovable property transfers and whether standing crop enters valuation.

The text explains that the timing of a gift of immovable property for gift-tax purposes is a question of law linked to execution and registration of the gift deed, so a Tribunal cannot refuse to state a case on that issue. It also notes that inclusion of the value of standing crop in the valuation of gifted immovable property did not raise a pure question of law, because no legal basis was shown for separate treatment of the crop. The reference was therefore warranted on the first issue but not on the second, illustrating that only genuinely referable legal questions qualify for tax reference.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the Tribunal was bound to refer the question whether the gift of immovable property took effect on the date of execution and registration of the gift deed for gift-tax purposes; and (ii) whether the inclusion of the value of standing crop in the valuation of the gifted estate raised a referable question of law.

Issue (i): Whether the Tribunal was bound to refer the question whether the gift of immovable property took effect on the date of execution and registration of the gift deed for gift-tax purposes.

Analysis: The date on which a gift of immovable property takes effect was treated as a question of law depending on the execution of the deed and its registration in accordance with law. Since the dispute directly concerned the assessment year applicable for gift-tax, the High Court held that the Tribunal could not decline to state the case on that question.

Conclusion: The Tribunal was directed to refer this question to the High Court.

Issue (ii): Whether the inclusion of the value of standing crop in the valuation of the gifted estate raised a referable question of law.

Analysis: The Court held that the proposed question did not disclose a pure question of law. It found no legal basis shown for including standing crop in the valuation of the gifted immovable property for gift-tax purposes, and observed that what is attached to the land ordinarily goes with the land unless a legal compulsion to treat it separately is established.

Conclusion: No reference was directed on this question.

Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded only in part, with a reference directed on the first question and refused on the second.

Ratio Decidendi: A reference under the tax reference provision must be made on a question that is genuinely referable as a question of law, and valuation issues unsupported by any legal foundation do not warrant a reference.

---