Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in refusing to receive the medical certificate sought to be produced for the first time before it and in declining to interfere with the dismissal of the assessee's appeal for want of sufficient cause for delay.
Analysis: The delay in filing the appeal before the first appellate authority was explained on the basis of an accident and fracture, but no medical certificate was produced at the relevant stage. Time was taken for filing the certificate, yet neither the certificate nor any adjournment application was filed. Even before the Tribunal, the certificate was not filed with the memo of appeal and was sought to be produced much later. On these facts, the refusal to receive it as additional evidence and the view that the delay had not been properly explained were held to be justified.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's view was upheld and the assessee's application for reference was dismissed.