TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether, on the death of a partner, the case amounted to succession of one firm by another firm under section 188 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, rather than a change in constitution under section 187; (ii) whether two separate assessments were required on the basis of the two returns filed; and (iii) whether the assessee-firm was entitled to be treated as a registered firm for the period up to the date of succession.
Issue (i): Whether the case amounted to succession of one firm by another firm under section 188 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, rather than a change in constitution under section 187.
Analysis: The parties were in agreement that, with effect from the date of death of the partner, the earlier firm stood succeeded by another firm within the meaning of section 188 and that the case did not fall within section 187 as a mere change in the constitution of the firm.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether two separate assessments were required on the basis of the two returns filed.
Analysis: Once succession under section 188 was accepted, the assessment position had to follow the distinct existence of the two firms for the relevant periods, warranting separate assessments on the two returns.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Issue (iii): Whether the assessee-firm was entitled to be treated as a registered firm for the period up to the date of succession.
Analysis: The application for registration having been filed within time, the firm remained entitled to be treated as a registered firm up to the date on which succession took place.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by accepting the assessee's position on all referred questions, including succession under section 188, rejection of section 187 treatment, separate assessments, and continuance of registered status till succession.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the death of a partner results in succession of one firm by another under section 188 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the case is not one of mere change in constitution under section 187, and the assessment consequences must follow the successive existence of the firms for the relevant periods.
TaxTMI 
