Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the unregistered written agreement dated 26 January 1973 constituted a sale of the trees in the estate and, on that basis, whether the capital asset stood transferred on that date for the purpose of capital gains assessment.
Analysis: The reference was decided by following the reasoning adopted in the connected co-owner matter on the same transaction. The unregistered written agreement was treated as a sale itself, and the transfer of the specific trees was held to have taken place on 26 January 1973. The remaining limb of the question was not answered.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was right in holding that the unregistered written agreement dated 26 January 1973 was a sale itself. This issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.