Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's entitlement to refund and interest under section 214 depended exclusively on producing a certificate of assessment from the Pakistani tax authorities, or whether other satisfactory collateral evidence could be accepted where such certificate could not be obtained.
Analysis: The arrangement for avoidance of double taxation required the tax demand to be kept in abeyance to the extent of the estimated abatement and provided for adjustment when a certificate of assessment from the other Dominion was produced. The provision did not impose an absolute statutory burden on the assessee to produce that certificate as the only means of proving foreign tax assessment. A certificate would ordinarily be the best evidence, but where it was impossible to obtain, the assessee could establish the foreign assessment and tax paid by other reliable material, such as copies of assessment orders, notices of demand, and allied records, for satisfaction of the taxing authority.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to prove the Pakistani assessment and tax payment by collateral evidence, and the claim to refund and interest could not be denied merely because the certificate of assessment was unavailable.