Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the income of a trust carrying on business, where the beneficiaries had determinate shares and were minors, could be assessed in the hands of the trustees as a body of individuals instead of being assessed in the same manner and to the same extent as in the hands of the beneficiaries.
Analysis: The beneficial interests were fixed and ascertainable under the trust deed. The fact that the trust carried on business did not alter the character of the assessment where the beneficiaries' shares were known or determinate. The circumstance that the beneficiaries were minors was held to be immaterial and, if anything, supported the conclusion that their consent to the trustees carrying on business was not relevant.
Conclusion: The assessment of the trust income in the status of a body of individuals was not justified. The income could be assessed in the hands of the beneficiaries or the trustees only in the same manner and to the same extent as it would have been assessed in the hands of the beneficiaries.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded and the impugned assessment treatment was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the beneficiaries of a trust have determinate shares, the trust income must be assessed in the same manner and to the same extent as in the hands of the beneficiaries, and the mere fact that the trust carries on business does not justify assessment of the trustees as a separate body of individuals.