TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Trustees' Business Income Distribution: Clarification on Tax Assessment Rules</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Kothari Family Trust & MARSONS BENEFICIARY TRUST & RAMDAYAL SHIVNARAYAN ATTAL FAMILY TRUST & RAJSONS & TRUSTEES OF ANILKUMAR TRUST & S.K. SHAH FAMILY TRUST</h3> The case involved the assessment of trustees of a trust with business income distributed among specified beneficiaries. The court clarified the ... Association Of Persons, Reference, Trusts Issues Involved:1. Manner of assessment to tax of the business income of the trust.2. Applicability of section 161(1) and section 164 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.3. Whether the beneficiaries can be considered as an association of persons.4. Double taxation of trust income.Summary:1. Manner of assessment to tax of the business income of the trust:The applications pertain to the assessment of trustees of a trust where the settlor has empowered trustees to carry on business. The income, including business income, is to be distributed among specified beneficiaries with determinate shares. The assessment years in question are prior to the insertion of section 161(1A) by the Finance Act, 1984, effective from April 1, 1985.2. Applicability of section 161(1) and section 164 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:Chapter XV of the Income-tax Act deals with tax liability in special cases, including representative assessees. Section 161(1) mandates that the representative assessee (trustee) is subject to the same duties, responsibilities, and liabilities as if the income were received by them beneficially. Section 164 applies where the individual shares of the beneficiaries are indeterminate or unknown, in which case the income is taxed as one unit. However, in these applications, the shares of the beneficiaries are known and determinate, thus section 164 is not applicable.3. Whether the beneficiaries can be considered as an association of persons:The Department's contention that beneficiaries should be considered as an association of persons was rejected. The trustees carry on business for the benefit of the beneficiaries, not on their behalf. The beneficiaries have not come together with the object of carrying on business nor have they authorized the trustees to do so. The trustees derive their authority from the settlor under the deed of trust, not from the beneficiaries. The Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Indira Balkrishna and the High Court's decision in CIT v. Balwantrai Jethalal Vaidya support this interpretation.4. Double taxation of trust income:In one application, the Tribunal discussed the issue of double taxation, noting that some beneficiaries had already been separately assessed on their beneficial interest in the trust's income. The Tribunal held that such income cannot be assessed again in the hands of the trustees. However, no specific question was framed on this aspect, so it was not further examined.Conclusion:The trustees must be assessed in the manner provided in section 161(1) of the Income-tax Act. The beneficiaries cannot be considered as an association of persons, and the trustees cannot be assessed as such. The rule issued in each application is discharged, and there will be no order as to costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
